On Centos 8 Firefox 69 worked great, but now when I try to update I get Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote
I know Centos 8 does not have a new enough version for openh264, but this has not caused any problems on FF69. Platform.openh264/x86_64/19.08 needs a later flatpak version (1.4.2;1.2.5;1.0.9;)
flatpak update
Looking for updates...
Installing in system:
org.freedesktop.Platform.openh264/x86_64/19.08 flathub 563e6c1a7173
Updating in system:
org.mozilla.Firefox/x86_64/stable fedora 445138d3b3fb
Is this ok [y/n]: y
Updating: org.mozilla.Firefox/x86_64/stable from fedora
Error: Failed to update org.mozilla.Firefox/x86_64/stable: Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote
Installing: org.freedesktop.Platform.openh264/x86_64/19.08 from flathub
Warning: Failed to install org.freedesktop.Platform.openh264/x86_64/19.08: runtime/org.freedesktop.Platform.openh264/x86_64/19.08 needs a later flatpak version (1.4.2;1.2.5;1.0.9;)
error: There were one or more errors
@sumomu, "Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote" sounds like an issue with flatpak, not this update
As for the openh264 error, the error is completely unrelated to this update. It's trying to say that the openh264 update from flathub (not from fedora) requires a newer flatpak version than what's available from centos. This should already be fixed as part of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754450 in RHEL 7.7.
@kalev Thanks for the update. I saw in a bugzilla report that Centos 8 Flatpak will also get the update that enables openh264 soon before Centos/RHEL 8.1 comes out.
As for the "Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote", I don't see how this can be a flatpak issues. Flatpak and my machine config has remained identical since I successfully installed Firefox 69, so something must have changed with Firefox 70 OR with the Fedora flatpak repo config. Can you think of any such change? Cheers!
Sorry, I don't know. I would suspect something in flatpak OCI backend is not working right. Maybe wait and see if the RHEL flatpak update improves things? Or maybe RHEL flatpak needs some OCI patches backported? This update installs just fine on Fedora.
@kalev Do you know where and to whom I can report this bug? I have a redhat Bugzilla account and fedora project account. I asked for help on the Reddit Centos and Fedora forums and no input other than turn off the gpg in the repo.
This update has been submitted for testing by kalev.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
This update has obsoleted firefox-master-3020191015151427.1, and has inherited its bugs and notes.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'.
kalev edited this update.
This update has been pushed to testing.
Works just fine.
This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi.
This update has been pushed to stable.
On Centos 8 Firefox 69 worked great, but now when I try to update I get
Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remoteI know Centos 8 does not have a new enough version for openh264, but this has not caused any problems on FF69.
Platform.openh264/x86_64/19.08 needs a later flatpak version (1.4.2;1.2.5;1.0.9;)I originally added the repo with
flatpak remote-add --if-not-exists fedora oci+https://registry.fedoraproject.org@sumomu, "Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote" sounds like an issue with flatpak, not this update
As for the openh264 error, the error is completely unrelated to this update. It's trying to say that the openh264 update from flathub (not from fedora) requires a newer flatpak version than what's available from centos. This should already be fixed as part of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754450 in RHEL 7.7.
@kalev Thanks for the update. I saw in a bugzilla report that Centos 8 Flatpak will also get the update that enables openh264 soon before Centos/RHEL 8.1 comes out.
As for the "Can't pull from untrusted non-gpg verified remote", I don't see how this can be a flatpak issues. Flatpak and my machine config has remained identical since I successfully installed Firefox 69, so something must have changed with Firefox 70 OR with the Fedora flatpak repo config. Can you think of any such change? Cheers!
Sorry, I don't know. I would suspect something in flatpak OCI backend is not working right. Maybe wait and see if the RHEL flatpak update improves things? Or maybe RHEL flatpak needs some OCI patches backported? This update installs just fine on Fedora.
@kalev Do you know where and to whom I can report this bug? I have a redhat Bugzilla account and fedora project account. I asked for help on the Reddit Centos and Fedora forums and no input other than turn off the gpg in the repo.
You could maybe file it against flatpak in Redhat Enterprise Linux 8 in bugzilla.redhat.com
@kalev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767007