stable

kernel-5.16.17-200.fc35

FEDORA-2022-d5866360a7 created by jforbes 2 years ago for Fedora 35

The 5.16.17 stable kernel update contains a number of important fixes across the tree.

Reboot Required
After installing this update it is required that you reboot your system to ensure the changes supplied by this update are applied properly.

How to install

Updates may require up to 24 hours to propagate to mirrors. If the following command doesn't work, please retry later:

sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-d5866360a7

This update has been submitted for testing by jforbes.

2 years ago

This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.

2 years ago
User Icon ibims commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Runs since it was ready in koji and looks ok for me. Works on baremetal (non UEFI mode) AMD Ryzen5 3600, Mainboard MSI B450M Mortar Max with prop. nvidia driver (510.47.03) from rpmfusion.org (GTX980 card). Works with Gnome-Desktop (Xorg). Regression test passed.

User Icon itrymybest80 commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

x86_64 Kaby Lake (desktop) + KVM. libhugetlbfs & paxtest skipped.

User Icon g6avk commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Works for me.. It's been running for a few hours now with no issues noticed. The enabled Default and Performance tests pass OK.

AMD 965, x86_64 Work Station (legacy BIOS) SSD's > RAID1. Plasma DE from Zawertun's COPR. nVidia GT1030 card using nVidia RPM's from RPMFusion (510.60.02)

User Icon geraldosimiao commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Works on Acer Aspire Intel® Core™ i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz Memory: 15.4 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa DRI Intel® HD Graphics 4000. Passed all kernel regression tests.

This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'.

2 years ago

This update's test gating status has been changed to 'passed'.

2 years ago
User Icon nivag commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Works for me: all using the Mate Desktop Environment.

sirius: desktop 16GB Intel i7-3770 CPU desktop (SSD + 5 hard drives in RAID-6) real:10m15.495s user:4m36.693s sys:5m9.186s

sedna: laptop 8GB Intel i5-2520M CPU Lenovo T420 (SSD only) real:107m53.061s user:72m31.284s sys:36m35.442s

User Icon wayne6001 commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Looks good. Default and performance tests pass on a NUC6i5SYK, Intel Core i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3)

User Icon nixuser commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Working OK here and regression tests are passing.

User Icon markec provided feedback 2 years ago
karma
User Icon imabug provided feedback 2 years ago
karma
User Icon bretth commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Default & performance tests pass (KVM)

This update has been pushed to testing.

2 years ago

This update can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes

2 years ago
User Icon bojan commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Works.

User Icon tiberias provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

it boots

User Icon atim provided feedback 2 years ago
karma
User Icon masami commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

i7-9700K(UHD Graphics 630): kernel regression test passed. Works fine for daily use.

User Icon njoy-njoy commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Using my laptop's Wi-Fi to stream videos is a big failure with a, Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 / AR9565 Wireless Network Adapter.

My Acer Aspire E1-570 laptop's log repeatedly contained the message

wpa_supplicant[959]: wlp3s0: CTRL-EVENT-BEACON-LOSS

This stable kernel update, and the 2 previous kernels all have the above ath9k driver regression

  • 5.16.15-201.fc35.x86_64
  • 5.16.16-200.fc35.x86_64
  • 5.16.17-200.fc35.x86_64

The 5.16.17-201.fc35.x86_64 scratch kernel build, fixes the above ath9k driver regression for my laptop; and I don't have to revert back to kernel version 5.16.14-200.fc35.x86_64, to get perfect Wi-Fi video streaming.

Clearly I am actively working the bug, and even provided you with a scratch build as soon as on was ready, which includes all of the other bug fixes from this kernel, so why is it that you feel anyone else who has gotten a bug fixed by this update should wait on those fixes until a proper kernel with an ath9k fix? It isn't a regression from the current stable kernel (5.16.16) so negative karma is unwarranted.

I'm more than happy to change my subjective karma rating from negative to neutral, as you imply. Thanks for all your input on working on the ath9k driver regression.

User Icon empressv commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

R5 2600 - works fine for daily use. libhugetlbfs and paxtest skipped during regression tests.

User Icon pwalter commented & provided feedback 2 years ago
karma

Works fine in VirtualBox

This update has been submitted for stable by jforbes.

2 years ago

This update has been pushed to stable.

2 years ago

Please login to add feedback.

Metadata
Type
security
Karma
15
Signed
Content Type
RPM
Test Gating
Autopush Settings
Unstable by Karma
-3
Stable by Karma
disabled
Stable by Time
disabled
Dates
submitted
2 years ago
in testing
2 years ago
in stable
2 years ago

Automated Test Results

Test Cases

0 13 Test Case kernel regression