The update doesn't seem to have fixed the SIGTRAP error;
looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reserve_resources_for_active_user_WS it seems some of the sysfs endpoints must now be obsolete? for instance /sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/memory.low could potentially now be in /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/user.slice/memory.* though there is no obvious equivalent of memory.low among the alternatives
BZ#2065813 [abrt] uresourced: r_app_monitor_start(): uresourced killed by SIGTRAP
Hmm, if /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/user.slice/memory.* sounds like a cgroupv1 path. I didn't think that Fedora supports that at this point. Or am I missing something?
You're right though, as I found systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=0 in my cmdline that maybe I have to blame docker for. uresourced maybe should handle it more gracefully though, well at least you know what to add for testing now :-)
This update has been submitted for testing by benzea.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'.
This update has been pushed to testing.
The update doesn't seem to have fixed the SIGTRAP error; looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Reserve_resources_for_active_user_WS it seems some of the sysfs endpoints must now be obsolete? for instance
/sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/memory.low
could potentially now be in/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/user.slice/memory.*
though there is no obvious equivalent ofmemory.low
among the alternativesHmm, if
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/user.slice/memory.*
sounds like a cgroupv1 path. I didn't think that Fedora supports that at this point. Or am I missing something?You're right though, as I found
systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=0
in mycmdline
that maybe I have to blame docker for.uresourced
maybe should handle it more gracefully though, well at least you know what to add for testing now :-)No issues found.
This update can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
This update has been submitted for stable by benzea.
This update has been pushed to stable.