{"update": {"autokarma": true, "autotime": true, "stable_karma": 3, "stable_days": 0, "unstable_karma": -3, "require_bugs": true, "require_testcases": true, "display_name": "", "notes": "Rebuild for libjxl soname bump.", "type": "enhancement", "status": "stable", "request": null, "severity": "medium", "suggest": "unspecified", "locked": false, "pushed": true, "critpath": false, "critpath_groups": null, "close_bugs": true, "date_submitted": "2021-11-22 00:52:57", "date_modified": null, "date_approved": null, "date_testing": "2021-11-22 00:53:46", "date_stable": "2021-11-22 00:56:34", "alias": "FEDORA-2021-b9cf5dd99c", "test_gating_status": "ignored", "from_tag": "f36-build-side-47992", "date_pushed": "2021-11-22 00:56:34", "meets_testing_requirements": true, "url": "https://bodhi.stg.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b9cf5dd99c", "title": "aom-3.2.0-2.fc36 jpegxl-0.6.1-6.fc36", "version_hash": "69a5c1ff81bd42453a6193f6a3052361806363a7", "release": {"name": "F36", "long_name": "Fedora 36", "version": "36", "id_prefix": "FEDORA", "branch": "f36", "dist_tag": "f36", "stable_tag": "f36-updates", "testing_tag": "f36-updates-testing", "candidate_tag": "f36-updates-candidate", "pending_signing_tag": "f36-signing-pending", "pending_testing_tag": "f36-updates-testing-pending", "pending_stable_tag": "f36-updates-pending", "override_tag": "f36-override", "mail_template": "fedora_errata_template", "state": "archived", "composed_by_bodhi": true, "create_automatic_updates": false, "package_manager": "dnf", "testing_repository": "updates-testing", "released_on": null, "eol": "2023-05-16", "critpath_mandatory_days_in_testing": 14, "mandatory_days_in_testing": 7, "critpath_min_karma": 2, "min_karma": 1, "setting_status": null}, "user": {"name": "besser82", "email": "besser82.fpo@gmail.com", "id": 206, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/28bacfa3be75032390ac2c7a34599aeb825c3b62b2c55ef64821d2fc023b56cb?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "besser82.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "proventesters"}, {"name": "packager"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "ambassadors"}, {"name": "designteam"}, {"name": "shogun-ca"}, {"name": "alt-gtk-de-sig"}, {"name": "trust admins"}]}, "comments": [{"karma": 0, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.", "timestamp": "2021-11-22 00:52:57", "update_id": 355527, "user_id": 91, "id": 2289599, "bug_feedback": [], "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "bodhi", "email": null, "id": 91, "avatar": "https://apps.fedoraproject.org/img/icons/bodhi-24.png", "openid": "bodhi.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": []}}, {"karma": 0, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'.", "timestamp": "2021-11-22 00:53:47", "update_id": 355527, "user_id": 91, "id": 2289600, "bug_feedback": [], "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "bodhi", "email": null, "id": 91, "avatar": "https://apps.fedoraproject.org/img/icons/bodhi-24.png", "openid": "bodhi.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": []}}, {"karma": 0, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi", "timestamp": "2021-11-22 00:56:35", "update_id": 355527, "user_id": 91, "id": 2289605, "bug_feedback": [], "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "bodhi", "email": null, "id": 91, "avatar": "https://apps.fedoraproject.org/img/icons/bodhi-24.png", "openid": "bodhi.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": []}}], "builds": [{"nvr": "aom-3.2.0-2.fc36", "signed": true, "release_id": 56, "type": "rpm", "epoch": 0}, {"nvr": "jpegxl-0.6.1-6.fc36", "signed": true, "release_id": 56, "type": "rpm", "epoch": 0}], "bugs": [{"bug_id": 2009099, "title": "aom-3.2.0 is available", "security": false, "parent": false, "feedback": [{"karma": 0, "comment_id": 2292783, "bug_id": 2009099, "comment": {"karma": -1, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "OK, just to make clear that the ABI is {{broken}}}  !", "timestamp": "2021-11-25 07:47:16", "update_id": 355528, "user_id": 468, "id": 2292783, "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "kwizart", "email": "kwizart@gmail.com", "id": 468, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/0287f4cda13f0a0fa5d8f1c5fd31409ebdc4daf396b43be6866e307786f4f3c4?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "kwizart.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "packager"}, {"name": "provenpackager"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "ambassadors"}, {"name": "web"}, {"name": "ask-fedora"}]}}}, {"karma": 0, "comment_id": 2292050, "bug_id": 2009099, "comment": {"karma": 0, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "Yet again an ABI break with this update.", "timestamp": "2021-11-24 09:19:13", "update_id": 355528, "user_id": 468, "id": 2292050, "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "kwizart", "email": "kwizart@gmail.com", "id": 468, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/0287f4cda13f0a0fa5d8f1c5fd31409ebdc4daf396b43be6866e307786f4f3c4?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "kwizart.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "packager"}, {"name": "provenpackager"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "ambassadors"}, {"name": "web"}, {"name": "ask-fedora"}]}}}, {"karma": 0, "comment_id": 2297861, "bug_id": 2009099, "comment": {"karma": -1, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "Not installable:\n```\n# dnf update\nLast metadata expiration check: 0:07:39 ago on Wed 01 Dec 2021 09:27:00 CET.\nError: \n Problem 1: package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - cannot install both libjxl-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 and libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n  - cannot install the best update candidate for package libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n  - cannot install the best update candidate for package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64\n Problem 2: package gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64 requires libheif.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - cannot install both libjxl-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 and libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n  - package jxl-pixbuf-loader-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - package jxl-pixbuf-loader-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - package jxl-pixbuf-loader-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl_threads.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - cannot install the best update candidate for package jxl-pixbuf-loader-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n  - cannot install the best update candidate for package gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64\n Problem 3: problem with installed package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64\n  - package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - cannot install both libjxl-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 and libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n  - package libaom-3.2.0-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - package libaom-3.2.0-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - cannot install the best update candidate for package libaom-3.1.2-1.fc35.x86_64\n Problem 4: problem with installed package gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64\n  - package gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64 requires libheif.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n  - cannot install both libjxl-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 and libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n  - libjxl-0.6.1-6.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture\n  - cannot install the best update candidate for package libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.i686\n(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)\n```", "timestamp": "2021-12-01 08:36:24", "update_id": 355528, "user_id": 237, "id": 2297861, "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "rathann", "email": "dominik@greysector.net", "id": 237, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/852ad2034e4d2de4eec5ee7c54530a61535edb605c2e9269cd07682a32fbdbaa?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "rathann.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "packager"}, {"name": "provenpackager"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "ambassadors"}, {"name": "scitech_sig"}, {"name": "scitech"}, {"name": "websites-apps-cms"}, {"name": "multimedia-sig"}]}}}, {"karma": 0, "comment_id": 2298207, "bug_id": 2009099, "comment": {"karma": -1, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "As @rathann indicated, this is not installable.  Using:\n\n        dnf update --refresh --best --allowerasing\n\nI get:\n\n         Error: \n          Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64\n          - problem with installed package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64\n          - package libheif-1.12.0-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed\n          - cannot install the best update candidate for package libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n          - cannot install both libjxl-0.6.1-6.fc35.x86_64 and libjxl-0.5-3.fc35.x86_64\n", "timestamp": "2021-12-01 15:14:34", "update_id": 355528, "user_id": 4322, "id": 2298207, "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "stevenfalco", "email": "stevenfalco@gmail.com", "id": 4322, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/5f487907376cdd04f78571ba31921a66f1739ff188a6e1df89ad6676403079cd?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "stevenfalco.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "packager"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "kicad"}]}}}, {"karma": 0, "comment_id": 2298336, "bug_id": 2009099, "comment": {"karma": 0, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "\nThis is not only about rpmfusion packages, we can still fix easily.\n\nBut there are a fair number of packages broken in fedora.", "timestamp": "2021-12-01 18:09:29", "update_id": 355528, "user_id": 468, "id": 2298336, "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "kwizart", "email": "kwizart@gmail.com", "id": 468, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/0287f4cda13f0a0fa5d8f1c5fd31409ebdc4daf396b43be6866e307786f4f3c4?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "kwizart.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "packager"}, {"name": "provenpackager"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "ambassadors"}, {"name": "web"}, {"name": "ask-fedora"}]}}}, {"karma": 0, "comment_id": 2300168, "bug_id": 2009099, "comment": {"karma": 0, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "@stevenfalco: `libheif` is not part of Fedora (likely installed from `rpmfusion-free`) and the update was not coordinated between Fedora + RPM Fusion (as expected - RPM Fusion is an independent 3rd party repo. I think there is some progress to rebuild the package but you should watch [RPMFusion bug 6158](https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6158).\n\nTherefore you should not give negative karma to this update.", "timestamp": "2021-12-03 15:30:05", "update_id": 355528, "user_id": 397, "id": 2300168, "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "fschwarz", "email": "felix.schwarz@oss.schwarz.eu", "id": 397, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/b8cb4367166f618dd0f5aebf7f52c79b72f33e8fa4c5a2e46c5c429c40f3b7e3?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "fschwarz.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "packager"}, {"name": "python-sig"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "certbot-sig"}, {"name": "python-packagers-sig"}]}}}, {"karma": 0, "comment_id": 2300180, "bug_id": 2009099, "comment": {"karma": 0, "karma_critpath": 0, "text": "Fair enough, regarding libheif.  But I just tried again with \"dnf update --refresh\" and got errors on packages that appear to be part of Fedora itself. @fschwarz, so I get it right next time, are the errors below sufficient to justify the negative karma?\n\n    ============================================================================================\n     Package                  Architecture  Version                Repository              Size\n    ============================================================================================\n    Skipping packages with conflicts:\n    (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):\n     libjxl                   x86_64        0.6.1-6.fc35           updates-archive        969 k\n     libjxl                   x86_64        0.6.1-6.fc35           updates                969 k\n    Skipping packages with broken dependencies:\n     gimp-jxl-plugin          x86_64        0.6.1-6.fc35           updates                 31 k\n     jxl-pixbuf-loader        x86_64        0.6.1-6.fc35           updates                 54 k\n     libaom                   x86_64        3.2.0-2.fc35           updates-archive        1.6 M", "timestamp": "2021-12-03 15:38:54", "update_id": 355528, "user_id": 4322, "id": 2300180, "testcase_feedback": [], "user": {"name": "stevenfalco", "email": "stevenfalco@gmail.com", "id": 4322, "avatar": "https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/5f487907376cdd04f78571ba31921a66f1739ff188a6e1df89ad6676403079cd?s=24&d=retro", "openid": "stevenfalco.id.stg.fedoraproject.org", "groups": [{"name": "packager"}, {"name": "ipausers"}, {"name": "fedora-contributor"}, {"name": "signed_fpca"}, {"name": "fedorabugs"}, {"name": "kicad"}]}}}]}], "updateid": "FEDORA-2021-b9cf5dd99c", "karma": 0, "content_type": "rpm", "test_cases": []}, "can_edit": false, "ci_allowed": false}