FEDORA-2021-a7a558062e — security update for kernel

stable

kernel-5.15.12-200.fc35

FEDORA-2021-a7a558062e created by jforbes a year ago for Fedora 35

The 5..15..12 stable kernel update contains a number of important fixes across the tree.

Reboot Required

After installing this update it is required that you reboot your system to ensure the changes supplied by this update are applied properly.

How to install

Updates may require up to 24 hours to propagate to mirrors. If the following command doesn't work, please retry later:

sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2021-a7a558062e

This update has been submitted for testing by jforbes.

a year ago

This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.

a year ago

bretth commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Default & performance tests pass (KVM)

Test Case kernel regression

ibims provided feedback a year ago

karma

Test Case kernel regression

itrymybest80 provided feedback a year ago

karma

Test Case kernel regression

This update's test gating status has been changed to 'failed'.

a year ago

This update's test gating status has been changed to 'passed'.

a year ago

g6avk commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Works for me, been up for a few hours now with no issues noticed.
The "enabled" default and performance tests pass OK.

Test Case kernel regression

nivag commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Works for me: 1 desktop (SSD + 5 hard drives in RAID-6) & 2 laptops (SSD’s only) all using the Mate Desktop Environment.

sirius: desktop 16GB Intel i7-3770 CPU – real:10m2.804s user:4m38.193s sys:4m50.266s

sedna: laptop 8GB Intel i5-2520M CPU Lenovo T420 – real:104m30.470s user:71m25.515s sys:33m56.813s

mercury: laptop 32GB AMD Ryzen 7 5700U with Radeon 5500 Graphics – rea1:14m22.951s user:6m44.569s sys:5m32.231s

*** I’m intensely curious as to the reason for why sedna seems to randomly fluctuate between short (under 11 minutes) & extremely long (over 100 minutes) elapsed times for the performance test!

Test Case kernel regression

imabug provided feedback a year ago

karma

Test Case kernel regression

This update has been pushed to testing.

a year ago

This update can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes

a year ago

bojan provided feedback a year ago

karma

besser82 commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Works great on Lenovo T480! LGTM! =)

gre0 commented & provided feedback a year ago

Installation and boot went fine on DesktopPC but Bluetooth initialization fails after reboot. Working again after complete power off/cold boot.

  Gigabyte GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI with Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless AC 3165 (ID 8087:0a2a)

After Reboot

  [greo_@f35 ~]$ dmesg -k |grep Bluetooth
  [    5.655174] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22
  [    5.655440] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
  [    5.655443] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
  [    5.655445] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized
  [    5.655449] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized
  [    6.467212] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3
  [    6.467215] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast
  [    6.467217] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
  [    7.876654] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0xfc05 tx timeout
  [    7.876660] Bluetooth: hci0: Reading Intel version command failed (-110)

After Cold Boot

 [greo_@f35 ~]$ dmesg -k |grep Bluetooth
 [    5.572699] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.22
 [    5.573201] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
 [    5.573205] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
 [    5.573207] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized
 [    5.573213] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized
 [    5.712756] Bluetooth: hci0: Legacy ROM 2.5 revision 1.0 build 3 week 17 2014
 [    5.715784] Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Bluetooth firmware file: intel/ibt-hw-37.8.10-fw-1.10.3.11.e.bseq
 [    6.454651] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3
 [    6.454653] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast
 [    6.454655] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
 [    6.952763] Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected event for opcode 0xfc2f
 [    6.985778] Bluetooth: hci0: Intel BT fw patch 0x32 completed & activated
 [   16.398942] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
 [   16.398948] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized
 [   16.398976] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11
 [greo_@f35 ~]$

gre0 commented & provided feedback a year ago

Forgot to mention…Bluetooth Issue is discussed there e.g.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/d9f53ef1-c15b-0f32-0233-88ff1b33a490@leemhuis.info/#t
(why link is not working?)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027071
https://www.reddit.com/r/Fedora/comments/rjutzb/fedora_35_and_bluetooth_problem/

geraldosimiao commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Works on Acer Aspire Intel® Core™ i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz Memory: 15.4 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa DRI Intel® HD Graphics 4000 no regressions. Return from suspension without problems.

Test Case kernel regression

seaninspace provided feedback a year ago

karma

Test Case kernel regression

rai510 commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

PASS

Test Case kernel regression

aalam commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

AMD 5700x with x570 is working function normally with package.

Test Case kernel regression

pwalter commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Works fine in VirtualBox

nixuser commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Kernel regression tests worked across my usual test set, and I haven't noticed any problems.

Test set:

ASUS G750JS 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700HQ CPU @ 2.40GHz Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06) NVIDIA Corporation GK104M [GeForce GTX 870M] (rev a1)

Intel NUC i7 NUC11PAH 1 x 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz Intel Corporation TigerLake-LP GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics] (rev 01)

Dell Optiplex 3040 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-6100T CPU @ 3.20GHz Intel Corporation HD Graphics 530 (rev 06)

Test Case kernel regression

kanderson provided feedback a year ago

karma

farribeiro provided feedback a year ago

karma

masami commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

i7-9700K(UHD Graphics 630): kernel regression test passed. Works fine for daily use.

Test Case kernel regression

tharadash commented & provided feedback a year ago

karma

Seems to work fine on bare-metal Z77, 3770K, RX570 with UEFI. No issues to report so far and kernel regression tests both PASS.

Seems to work fine on HP EliteBook 840 G6 with UEFI and SecureBoot. No issues to report so far and kernel regression tests both PASS.

Test Case kernel regression

This update has been submitted for stable by jforbes.

a year ago

spike provided feedback a year ago

karma

Test Case kernel regression

This update has been pushed to stable.

a year ago

Please login to add feedback.

Metadata

Type

security

Severity

high

Karma

Signed

Content Type

RPM

Test Gating

passed

Builds

kernel-5.15.12-200.fc35

Settings

Unstable by Karma

-3

Stable by Karma

disabled

Stable by Time

disabled

Dates

submitted

a year ago

in testing

a year ago

in stable

a year ago

BZ#2035817 CVE-2021-45469 kernel: out-of-bounds memory access in __f2fs_setxattr() in fs/f2fs/xattr.c when an inode has an invalid last xattr entry

BZ#2035818 CVE-2021-45469 kernel: out-of-bounds memory access in __f2fs_setxattr() in fs/f2fs/xattr.c when an inode has an invalid last xattr entry [fedora-all]

kernel-5.15.12-200.fc35

Automated Test Results

passed

Test Cases


0	14	Test Case kernel regression