According to openQA, this breaks FreeIPA server deployment, with error name 'ensure_list_str' is not defined. Perhaps it needs some other bit to be updated alongside it.
ah, no, it's just a straight-up error. src/lib389/lib389/instance/setup.py added some uses of ensure_list_str, but neglected to import it from lib389.utils, where it's defined.
@adamwill@mreynolds could you backport patch at least to rawhide?
This bodhi update is obsoleted and thus cannot create issues in f31 updates-testing. But rawhide is more critical.
I am going to be doing a completely fresh build. We have found other regressions in 1.4.2.6. These are all fixed now, so I'm just going to do a 1.4.2.7 build. Thanks for testing the patches you applied though!!!
This update has been submitted for testing by mreynolds.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'.
According to openQA, this breaks FreeIPA server deployment, with error
name 'ensure_list_str' is not defined. Perhaps it needs some other bit to be updated alongside it.This update has been obsoleted.
ah, no, it's just a straight-up error.
src/lib389/lib389/instance/setup.pyadded some uses ofensure_list_str, but neglected to import it fromlib389.utils, where it's defined.Yeah I just fixed it, doesn't look like this commit was even manually tested, errrr! Anyway need to do new builds now...
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50815 should fix the problem.
@adamwill @mreynolds could you backport patch at least to rawhide? This bodhi update is obsoleted and thus cannot create issues in f31 updates-testing. But rawhide is more critical.
Done.
I wasn't able to backport the patch because pagure wasn't letting anyone do anything over git (ssh). There are other regressions in this build. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791342
I don't think this build should have been pushed to stable :-/
This wasn't pushed stable? It was obsoleted. For Rawhide I spotted some later fixes and backported those too...hopefully it should be OK.
I am going to be doing a completely fresh build. We have found other regressions in 1.4.2.6. These are all fixed now, so I'm just going to do a 1.4.2.7 build. Thanks for testing the patches you applied though!!!