stable

firefox-41.0-4.fc22

FEDORA-2015-16455 created by stransky 9 years ago for Fedora 22

firefox-41.0-4.fc21 - New upstream 41.0

firefox-41.0-4.fc22 - New upstream 41.0

firefox-41.0-4.fc23 - New upstream 41.0

How to install

Updates may require up to 24 hours to propagate to mirrors. If the following command doesn't work, please retry later:

sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2015-16455

This update has been submitted for testing by stransky.

9 years ago
User Icon markuss commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

This build requires sqlite 3.8.11 which isn't even listed on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=sqlite Can't it build against 3.8.10?

sqlite 3.8.11 is available in Koji, but hasn't been added for testing in Bodhi. (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=686935) I added the necessary packages and am testing this Firefox build now.

(Bah, I updated my packages not "added".)

User Icon drago01 commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

Works fine here with the sqlite build from koji. (You should add that to the update to make sure they get pushed as a unit).

That aside OMTC seems to work on both radeonsi and intel based hardware even with layers acceleration enabled (before it was crashy even with just basic).

End result is that performance is much improved.

Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox browse
Test Case firefox media

There's going to be a new version of sqlite today so I need to respin Firefox for that. New update is coming.

Unfortunately I can't remove this update....

User Icon anonymous commented & provided feedback 9 years ago

I downloaded the .src.rpm and build it (using dnf builddep and rpmbuild --rebuild). I did not have a problem with SQLite. Mine is 3.8.10.2-1.fc22 and I was able to compile the srpm into a working rpms, and run that rpm.

I did pass all the tests. And did already about 2 hours of browsing without a single problem. I also did run the usual benchmark (kraken, octane, etc.) just to stress a bit the browser. And also used the html5test.com service to test for HTML5 features (you can compare results to previous FF release). All worked.

karma: +1

Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox media
Test Case firefox browse

@stransky: You don't have to ... submitting a newer build should obsolete it.

Hm, I need to add the missing sqlite package.

According to the bodhi FAQ: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi2#FAQ ... seems like this happens while the update is being pushed. So you'd have to wait until it changes from pending to testing before being able to edit it.

Question: why wait for SQLite 3.8.11 when it can work with SQLite 3.8.10?

I mean FF 41 includes security fix, so the update should not be stuck because of a non critical dependency update.

So I would answer my initial question: ship FF 41 with SQLite 3.8.10 now (as mentioned in a previous comment - that was me the anonymous guy - it works when using the srpms and compiling against 3.8.10). And if SQLite 3.8.11 is such great update, then we could publish a firefox-41.0-5.fc22 when both are ready.

User Icon dhgutteridge commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

I've been running this for the last day, and the earlier 41.0-3 that was available in Koji before that, and I haven't encountered any regressions vs. 40. (I have found with both 40 and 41 that there's occasional instability when playing HTML5 video content I hadn't tripped over until recently. In one case it brought the browser down and in another it brought my entire Gnome session down -- the only time I've ever experienced data loss with Fedora. But it's not a regression in 41 specifically.)

Test Case firefox media
Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox browse

I'm confused. Are we waiting for a new build or is someone going to fix this one? It's not even on updates-testing, yet.

I strongly agree with huygens, too. I don't understand how Fedora users are still waiting for this security fix.

Adding sqlite to this update wont delay anything. The fact that the update is not in testing yet has nothing to do with it ... it just that the push takes longer for whatever (unrelated) reasons.

Filed request to bodhi admins here: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/601 as per instruction bellow the page.

User Icon dutchy commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

Works fine, obviously with sqlite-3.8.11.1.

Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox media
Test Case firefox browse
User Icon anonymous commented & provided feedback 9 years ago

works fine with sqlite-3.8.11.1, too.

karma: +1

Test Case firefox media
Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox browse
User Icon anonymous commented & provided feedback 9 years ago

Works fine

karma: +1

Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox browse
Test Case firefox media
User Icon tibbs commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

Working well for me, including my pile of extensions and a custom media-intensive application.

Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox browse
Test Case firefox media
User Icon juml provided feedback 9 years ago
karma
Test Case firefox browse
Test Case firefox media
User Icon djuran commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

Updates fine if one pulls in the sqlite update as well and works well so far

This update has been pushed to testing.

9 years ago

This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi.

9 years ago

I think this is an example of how not to push important updates. This build of FF may reach stable before sqlite it requires reaches testing. A recipe for breaking a lot of systems. Shouldn't these two be going together?

Actually, I'm wrong about systems being broken. I see that there is a requires in this package for sqlite >= 3.8.11, so it just won't install for most people (i.e. dnf will refuse to do it).

If you want to have the update now but with SQLite 3.8.10, download the src.rpm and do:

 $ sudo dnf builddep ~/Downloads/firefox-41.0-4.fc22.src.rpm
 $ rpmbuild --rebuild ~/Downloads/firefox-41.0-4.fc22.src.rpm
 $ sudo dnf install ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/firefox-41.0-4.fc22.x86_64.rpm

To my knowledge this won't break anything. When FF 41.0-4 is out, you won't get the update even after SQLite 3.8.11 is out. But when either FF 41.0-5 or 41.1-1 is out, then you will get the update as usual. The 3.8.11 update is not critical (see https://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_8_11.html) but as a few nice feature and advertised better performanced. So if security is not paramount for you, you might want to wait (I did not!).

User Icon davem commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

Good here.

Test Case firefox media
Test Case firefox addons
Test Case firefox browse

So, so confusing. Firstly, when will Fedora users be able to get this security update? It's still not even available via updates-testing. (Obviously, I mean a binary rpm on the mirrors, normal update procedure.) Secondly, what is the source of the delay? drago01 says the sqlite requirement is not related at all, but every other post here suggest that is.

This update has been pushed to stable.

9 years ago

Can't dnf update to 41 because broken dependencies :-(

Broken dependency. Solved by upgrading to sqlite version in Testing

User Icon markuss commented & provided feedback 9 years ago
karma

Seriously: Depending a securitiy-critical update on an unreleased Sqlite package is madness!

I can not updating my FF to 41 version on Fedora 22 (broken dependency). How can i solve my cause?

Okay, so I think I see what was going on. Maybe FF41 was out there on updates-testing, but, since it requires new sqlite that wasn't available, dnf wouldn't upgrade it. That's just what bojan said, above. But, as soon as the new sqlite was available, dnf found it and would do the upgrade.

Shouldn't be long now before sqlite hits the normal updates repo, but I got a slight jump on it with --enablerepo=updates-testing; that's where dnf found the new sqlite.

So, the answer to my question is, yes, the sqlite dep was a major part of this delay.

The problem is that this update was locked in Bodhi so I could not add the sqlite packages here. Also the sqlite package was locked. See the ticket I filled at issue tracker and the first comments here.


Please login to add feedback.

Metadata
Type
security
Severity
high
Karma
6
Signed
Content Type
RPM
Test Gating
Autopush Settings
Unstable by Karma
-3
Stable by Karma
3
Stable by Time
disabled
Dates
submitted
9 years ago
in testing
9 years ago
in stable
9 years ago

Automated Test Results

Test Cases

0 4 Test Case firefox addons
0 5 Test Case firefox browse
0 5 Test Case firefox media
0 0 Test Case firefox screenshot
0 0 Test Case User:Sr02mu/Draft/firefox bookmark