Comments

129 Comments
karma

No problems using it since yesterday on a laptop and two NUCs. Default and performance tests passed on all three.

Dell XPS 13 9350 [Intel Core i7-6560U CPU @ 2.20GHz × 4, Mesa Intel Iris Graphics 540] and two NUC6i5SYK [Intel Core i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel Iris Graphics 540] .

karma

Default and performance regression tests both PASS on a Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop (i7-6560U CPU @ 2.20GHz × 4) and on two NUC6i5SYK (i5-6260U @ 1.80GHz × 4). Have been using it on my laptop for a day with no problems.

@nivag Deleting and reinstalling the kernel_tests directory worked for me.

karma

Default and performance tests pass and performance numbers in log look good (NUC6i5SYK, Intel® Core™ i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel® Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3)).

karma

Default and performance regression tests both PASS on a Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop (i7-6560U CPU @ 2.20GHz × 4) and on two NUC6i5SYK (i5-6260U @ 1.80GHz × 4). Working fine.

@jforbes I agree with you. It's terrific that we get new kernels so quickly :)

@jforbes One possibility is to change "Karma: Is the update generally functional?" to "Karma: Should the update replace the current kernel?"

Default and performance regression tests on a Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop (i7-6560U CPU @ 2.20GHz × 4) and on two NUC6i5SYK (i5-6260U @ 1.80GHz × 4). Performance test logs show performance is similar to other recent kernels on all three devices. Have been running this on my personal laptop since yesterday without any problems. Looks good!

karma

NUC6i5SYK, Intel® Core™ i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel® Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3). default and performance tests pass with performance log showing results similar to other recent kernels.

karma

NUC6i5SYK, Intel® Core™ i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel® Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3), 15.5 GiB. Both default and performance tests passed, with performance results are in the typical range for this device (and 5.17.13 is much faster than 5.18.2 for this NUC).

karma

Default and Performance tests passed on two NUC6i5SYK and on a Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop. All are working as usual.

karma

Seems fine on Dell XPS 13 9300 laptop with starting it with firefox-wayland

Test Case firefox browse
Test Case firefox media

Default and Performance tests passed on a NUC6i5SYK and on a Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop. Working fine on the laptop in normal use.

karma

Default and Performance tests passed on a NUC6i5SYK and on a Dell XPS 13 9350 laptop. Running without problems on three machines since it was available yesterday.

@uservikol -- you didn't say which tests in the test suites failed and I'd guess a lot of people don't realize there is a link to particular tests.

If you click on "kernel regression" above where it says "Test Case kernel regression" it will take you to a web page that describes how to run two kernel regression test suites.

I think it would be clearer if it was labeled "Test Case kernel test suites" or if it had separate lines for "Test Case Default Tests" and "Test Case Performance Tests".

The way it is now, if you don't click on the link, it could be read as asking if you'd noticed any regressions in your own personal testing.

karma

default and performance regression tests pass on NUC6i5SYK.

karma

Default and Performance tests pass on NUC6i5SYK, Intel® Core™ i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel® Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3).

karma

fine in my normal use

Test Case firefox browse
Test Case firefox media

Default and Performance tests both pass on NUC6i5. Working in usual use on my Dell xps13 laptop.

karma

both default and performance regression tests pass on NUC6i5. Dell XPS 13 laptop working in normal use without problems so far.

Default and Performance regression tests PASS on NUC6i5SYK, Intel® Core™ i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel® Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3). Also, has been working fine on my laptop for the past 3 days (Dell XPS 13 9350).