$ fc-validate -l th /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:0 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:1 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:2 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:3 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:4 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:5 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:6 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:7 Missing 74 glyph(s) to satisfy the coverage for th language
$ echo $?
1
$ fc-validate -l zh_cn /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:0 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:1 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:2 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:3 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:4 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:5 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:6 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-cjk/NotoSansCJK-Regular.ttc:7 Satisfy the coverage for zh-cn language $ echo $?
The Default and Performance tests pass OK. Lenovo x230 i7-3520M
bug #1716384 seems to be fixed. Tested it according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716384#c0
Works just fine
Works just fine