Comments

112 Comments

@msrb Yup, found and used it later...

karma

OK, baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation passed. To sum it up, all the gating tests either passed in CI or I can waive them.

fedora-ci.koji-build.installability.functional done, not funny. Misled by https://github.com/fedora-ci/mini-tps. The actual procedure was: get an updated Fedora Rawhide machine and there:

dnf copr enable @osci/mini-tps
dnf -y install mini-tps

mtps-prepare-system --list
PROFILE_NAME=fedora-42

export TASK_ID=125886205

git clone https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline.git
cd installability-pipeline

cat installability.fmf
bash prepare.sh
/usr/local/libexec/mini-tps/installability_runner.sh --critical --skiplangpack --selinux=1 --repo=brew-$TASK_ID
echo $?

At this moment, the only remaining test job is baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation...

Great. Even the tests that passed on the first attempt are now failing because of infrastructure problems. Once again manual effort necessary, sigh...

fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional is fine, passed originally and in my manual run as well

fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis has just one minor annocheck thing, already solved, popping up here only because rpminspect is still using older annobin-libannocheck

baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation is in progress

fedora-ci.koji-build.installability.functional - will do manually

karma

CI findings:

fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis - not a regression, low prio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323797

baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation - just a glitch, not a problem of annobin

No regression seen, feel free to promote the build.

karma

All right, baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation passed.

In summary, the gating failures are not important. Feel free to promote the build.

Gating failures:

fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis - Not a regression. Nevertheless I've just filed it as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323797. It would be nice not to inspect the failing test on each and every build...

baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation - I'm rerunning it aside right now. Will need a few hours, then I'll report back.

FWIW, I've just sent a PR to rpminspect so the unicode false positives won't bother us in the future: https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora/pull/59

karma

There are two gating tests failing:

  1. baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation - strace can't be rebuilt but it's a known strace bug unrelated to annobin (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317070)

  2. fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis - same old, same old

Nick, feel free to promote the build.

karma

fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional failed because it uses an older version of the downstream tests (incompatible with the new rpmbuild layout), it would pass with the new version already present in Rawhide.

Feel free to waive that and promote the build

I've prepared a PR to update the tests in F41: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dwz/pull-request/16. The dist-git test (ie. fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional) passed there.

karma

Failures seen in Automated Tests:

Overall, feel free to waive the tests and promote the build.

Just for the record, the failure of fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional was not caused by any genuine bug in the update, it was the test that needed a change to keep up with the updated package. Fixed now: https://artifacts.osci.redhat.com/testing-farm/3e49d419-c11e-465c-8d94-1488472df9eb/

karma

CI failed in two tests:

  1. baseos-qe.koji-build.scratch-build.validation - that was just an infrastructure error, all the rebuilds worked fine

  2. fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis - missing results due to some infrastructure error. I ran it manually and filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295573. Not a blocker, though.

BZ#2294381 has been fixed. I'd suggest to push the build to production.

BZ#2294381 dnf upgrade produces file ownership problems; libstdc++-14.1.1-6.fc41.i686 vs .x86_64 .pyc files conflict

Forgot to mention, CI reported one fail in fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional but that was a problem in the test itself (which I've just fixed).

karma

No regression observed

karma

No regression observed