Comments
tyrbiter
Installation fails with this message
Dependencies resolved.
Problem 1: problem with installed package libtiff-devel-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 - package libtiff-devel-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff(x86-64) = 4.4.0-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libtiff-4.4.0-4.fc36.x86_64 and libtiff-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libtiff-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package vtk-mpich-devel-9.1.0-12.fc36.x86_64 - package vtk-mpich-devel-9.1.0-12.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff-devel(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed - package libtiff-devel-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff(x86-64) = 4.4.0-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - package libtiff-devel-4.3.0-6.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff(x86-64) = 4.3.0-6.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libtiff-4.4.0-4.fc36.x86_64 and libtiff-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both libtiff-4.4.0-4.fc36.x86_64 and libtiff-4.3.0-6.fc36.x86_64 - libtiff-4.4.0-4.fc36.i686 has inferior architecture - cannot install the best update candidate for package libtiff-4.4.0-2.fc36.i686 Problem 3: problem with installed package vtk-devel-9.1.0-12.fc36.x86_64 - package vtk-devel-9.1.0-12.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff-devel(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed - package libtiff-devel-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff(x86-64) = 4.4.0-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - package libtiff-devel-4.3.0-6.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff(x86-64) = 4.3.0-6.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libtiff-4.4.0-4.fc36.x86_64 and libtiff-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both libtiff-4.4.0-4.fc36.x86_64 and libtiff-4.3.0-6.fc36.x86_64 - package libtiff-tools-4.4.0-4.fc36.x86_64 requires libtiff(x86-64) = 4.4.0-4.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package libtiff-tools-4.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64
the blueman-nautilus issue is no longer a problem, however it does mean losing the function it provided.
I think this should return in Fedora 37 once the blueman-2.2.3 influence is removed from the Fedora repo.
Sorry, karma should have been negative
blender-luxcorerender-2.6-2.fc36 wants to downgrade to blender-3.1.2-3.fc36
blender-luxcorerender-2.6-2.fc36.x86_64.rpm 1.0 MB/s | 3.7 MB 00:03
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================================================================================
Package Architecture Version Repository Size
================================================================================================================================================
Installing:
blender-luxcorerender x86_64 2.6-2.fc36 @commandline 3.7 M
Downgrading:
blender x86_64 1:3.1.2-3.fc36 updates 42 M
Transaction Summary
Install 1 Package Downgrade 1 Package
Rebuilt for Fedora 36 and seems to be working well, note that the clamd.exim.service file ideally needs:
TimeoutStartSec=420
to ensure that a lengthy load of clamav databases doesn't cause the startup to fail.
Running for a day or so, no obvious problems.
I get this when attempting to update this rpm
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package python3-pykeepass-4.0.1-4.fc36.noarch
- nothing provides python3.10dist(construct) >= 2.10.68 needed by python3-pykeepass-4.0.2-2.fc36.noarch
Dependencies resolved.
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package kitty-0.25.0-1.fc36.x86_64 - nothing provides /usr/bin/-S needed by kitty-0.25.0-2.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package kitty-0.25.0-1.fc36.x86_64 - package kitty-0.25.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires kitty-terminfo = 0.25.0-1.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both kitty-terminfo-0.25.0-2.fc36.noarch and kitty-terminfo-0.25.0-1.fc36.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package kitty-terminfo-0.25.0-1.fc36.noarch - nothing provides /usr/bin/-S needed by kitty-0.25.0-2.fc36.x86_64
Right, but then this is for the installed darktable package:
[ ]$ ldd /usr/bin/darktable | grep gmic [ ]$
which seems pretty odd.
Latest darktable.spec file contains BuildRequires: gmic-devel but I don't see any Requires: entries for gmic packages in there.
The odd thing here is that darktable does not appear to link to libgmic.so so I don't know why gmic is unable to update because of a package that isn't using it as a link target.
Requires a rebuild of darktable-3.8.1-1
Problem: problem with installed package darktable-3.8.1-1.fc36.x86_64 - package darktable-3.8.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libgmic.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both gmic-3.1.0-1.fc36.x86_64 and gmic-2.9.9-2.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package gmic-2.9.9-2.fc36.x86_64
OK, the -2 package does indeed install correctly.
The update will not install due to the following issues:
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package moreutils-0.63-6.fc36.x86_64 - nothing provides perl(IPC-Run) needed by moreutils-0.67-1.fc36.x86_64 - nothing provides perl(Time-Duration) needed by moreutils-0.67-1.fc36.x86_64 - nothing provides perl(Time-HiRes) needed by moreutils-0.67-1.fc36.x86_64
None of the perl packages referenced show up in updates-testing or in bodhi as yet.
Upgrade attempt fails with this error message:
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package revelation-0.5.4-6.fc36.noarch - nothing provides python3dist(gobject) needed by revelation-0.5.5-2.fc36.noarch ============================================================================================================================================ Package Architecture Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================ Skipping packages with broken dependencies: revelation noarch 0.5.5-2.fc36 updates-testing 373 k
Transaction Summary
Skip 1 Package
Nothing to do.
Been running these for a couple of days, seems to be fine AFAICT.
Installed all the updated packages and everything works as normal and seems to have no obvious problems.
Needs another tool updated but there is no updated version available:
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package nanovna-saver-0.3.10-4.fc36.noarch - nothing provides (python3.10dist(numpy) < 1.22~~ with python3.10dist(numpy) >= 1.21.1) needed by nanovna-saver-0.4.0-1.fc36.noarch - nothing provides python3.10dist(pyserial) >= 3.5 needed by nanovna-saver-0.4.0-1.fc36.noarch
For some reason this worked for me today when I ran an update with updates-testing enabled, and yes i have -tools and -devel installed. None of the vtk packages have updated, I have no idea why this happened.