Comments
mhjacks
commented & provided feedback
on awesome-vim-colorschemes-0-15.20240722gitae5e022.21.el9
3 months ago
LGTM
Downloaded and tested from koji. LGTM!
The bluetooth regression (BZ#2274047) is definitely fixed in this. No other regressions noted.
Tested from Koji, rendered Chrome and VScode correctly as hoped
I have seen the brokenness with both Chrome and VSCode.
Should this update be unpushed?
Tested with freeipa-provided subid's successfully. LGTM
LGTM; confirm that this fixes the issue with installing signed collections
LGTM! Also tested specifically with FreeIPA provided subid's. When not configured correctly, toolbox still fails as expected.
Seems the current spec still has a %package quadlet:
%package quadlet
Summary: Easily create systemd services using %{name}
Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Conflicts: quadlet
I don't know if that explains the behavior, but I think the conflicts belongs in the main package now, at least
I definitely had to remove podman-quadlet manually. I'm looking at the specfile and I see the obsoletes line, and it appears to be correct.
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
Transaction ID : 695
Begin time : Thu 09 Feb 2023 08:38:05 AM CST
Begin rpmdb : 1e4cd75cbd9ba87adccd9919af8123226f00136441e8e4a2d4cf099eb7ca35b1
End time : Thu 09 Feb 2023 08:38:06 AM CST (1 seconds)
End rpmdb : db15e28b7e950e8269ca18d663af7c8c5469298e649d82ee1773ab95bef9c0da
User : Martin Jackson <mjackson>
Return-Code : Success
Releasever : 37
Command Line : erase podman-quadlet
Comment :
Packages Altered:
Removed podman-quadlet-5:4.4.0-1.fc37.x86_64 @@System
(From the manual removal) vs:
Obsoletes: %{name}-quadlet <= 5:4.4.0-1
in the current specfile. So I'm not sure why I would have had to do that...
Pulled from the koji builds. Works for rootless and rootful containers.
Note that the previously built subpackage podman-quadlet has now been integrated into the podman binary package in this release. You will need to remove podman-quadlet manually if you have one.
I think that depends on https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-041092cd8f which should hit stable before podman does
I have a neovim conflict on my system:
Problem: package neovim-0.10.1-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libtree-sitter.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libtree-sitter-0.23.0-1.fc40.x86_64 from imladris_f40_x86_64_f40_x86_64_updates_testing and libtree-sitter-0.22.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System - cannot install both libtree-sitter-0.23.0-1.fc40.x86_64 from imladris_f40_x86_64_f40_x86_64_updates_testing and libtree-sitter-0.22.2-1.fc40.x86_64 from imladris_f40_x86_64_release - cannot install both libtree-sitter-0.23.0-1.fc40.x86_64 from imladris_f40_x86_64_f40_x86_64_updates_testing and libtree-sitter-0.22.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from imladris_f40_x86_64_f40_x86_64_updates - cannot install the best update candidate for package neovim-0.10.1-1.fc40.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libtree-sitter-0.22.5-1.fc40.x86_64 ==================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ==================================================================================================== Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): libtree-sitter x86_64 0.22.2-1.fc40 imladris_f40_x86_64_release 101 k libtree-sitter x86_64 0.23.0-1.fc40 imladris_f40_x86_64_f40_x86_64_updates_testing 102 k
Transaction Summary
Skip 2 Packages
Nothing to do. Complete!