Comments

48 Comments

works for me

BZ#1415496 rpcbind fails at boot
BZ#1415896 rpcbind fails at startup
karma

works for me

BZ#1415896 rpcbind fails at startup
BZ#1415496 rpcbind fails at boot
BZ#1401561 rpcbind-0.2.4-1.fc25 fails to start at boot

@jwrdegoede: What I actually did was to run

# dnf update --enablerepo=updates-testing 'mesa-libGL*' 'libglvnd*'

to check if it resolves the current brokeness related to mesa/libglvnd in current "stable"

[How could this have happened? Does Fedora have any QA?]

 # dnf update --refresh --enablerepo=updates-testing 'mesa-lib*' 'libglvnd*'

however work.

Package is uninstallable: Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/lib64/libEGL.so.1.0.0 from install of libglvnd-egl-1:0.2.999-7.gitdc16f8c.fc25.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mesa-libEGL-13.0.3-1.fc25.x86_64

Propagates #1415496 to fc24 and breaks yp/nis

BZ#1415496 rpcbind fails at boot
karma

Fails at boot: rpcbind: /run/rpcbind/rpcbind.lock: No such file or directory

BZ#1415496 rpcbind fails at boot
BZ#1401561 rpcbind-0.2.4-1.fc25 fails to start at boot
BZ#1372463 rpcbind-0.2.3-11.rc1.fc24 update sometimes does not restart statd or ypbind properly

work for me

BZ#1412668 youtube-dl: ERROR: Signature extraction failed

Works for me. Seems to resolve #1370702

kernel-4.8.0-0.rc2.git3.1.fc25.i686 fails to boots for me: kernel BUG at ./include/linux/page-flags.h:275!

kernel.4.8.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc25.i686 worked.

karma

works for me on x86_64 and i686.

karma

The first Fedora/RH fc24 i686-4.5.x-series kernel which appears to boot properly for me on my old Atom N270 based netbook.

@hreindl: With this kernel upgrade you guys are breaking a whole family of chipsets Fedora 23 supported midst of lifetime of a release.

Finally: kernel-4.5.4-200.fc23 seems to work fine on a real Pentium III. So, I believe, the "i686"-probs I am facing, likely are not an i686-architectural issue, but are an i915 driver on i945*/Atom GPUs regression (The machine exposing the breakdowns is an Atom N270 based netbook).

karma

Like all 4.5.x kernels before, i686 fails for me with #1303860.

karma

i686 has inherited fc24 dysfunctionality from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303860

@jforbes: I reported the i915 issue 2 months ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307033 sad but true: it was ignored.

But you are right insofar, it was overshadowed by other issues (those nickc, hjlu and other addressed) which rendered reproducing it difficult.

Anyway, lets stop this discussion here. bodhi is not the right place to discuss it or RH politics.

@jforbes: I understand, RH is not interested in the i686 anymore and "fedora-testing" therefore has defined the i686 as irrelevant. I regret, but to me this read as "RH is not interested in the community", anymore.

Wasn't this update primarily to address i686 issues on bare metal?

FYI: kernel-PAE-4.5.2-301.fc24.i686 boots for me but later on fails with i915-problems.

BZ#1302071 i686 kernel-4.5.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc24 does not boot on some systems (KVMs, some metal)

kernel-PAE-4.5.2-300.fc24.i386 (From testing) does not boot at all for me on i386 bare metal. All I am seeing is a "black screen".

karma

SELinux-warnings are gone, but mock doesn't build packages anymore.

BZ#1312820 Lots of WARNING: unable to delete selinux filesystems