Works OK here in general usage

Works OK here

Works well!

Works well!

DNF works well with this, no segfaults.

Got an error here:

Finish: run

03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG        CheckRpmlintInstalled completed: 46.150 seconds
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Running check: CheckRpmlintDebuginfo
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG        CheckRpmlintDebuginfo completed: 0.002 seconds
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Running check: CheckInitDeps
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Exception down the road...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 239, in run
    self._do_run(outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 229, in _do_run
    self._do_report(outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 99, in _do_report
    self._run_checks(self.bug.spec_file, self.bug.srpm_file, outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 118, in _run_checks
    writedown=not Settings.no_report)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/checks.py", line 378, in run_checks
    run_check(name)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/checks.py", line 352, in run_check
    check.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/generic_build.py", line 358, in run
    deps.init()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/deps.py", line 36, in init
    'dnf'])
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 395, in check_output
    **kwargs).stdout
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 472, in run
    with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as process:
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 775, in __init__
    restore_signals, start_new_session)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 1453, in _execute_child
    restore_signals, start_new_session, preexec_fn)
TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, not NoneType
03-18 10:39 root         ERROR    Exception down the road...(logs in /home/asinha/.cache/fedora-review.log)
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Report completed:  500.607 seconds

The command-line was: $ fedora-review -b 1649059

$ fedora-review -V
fedora-review version 0.7.0 dfc9dd8 2019-03-17 14:56:47 -0400
external plugins:

Unsure if this is a fedora-review bug, so not giving -1 just yet.

F28 I meant, sorry!

This was a Fedora 29 server machine. I got this warning: "WARNING: 'edid-decode' package is not installed". Should it be added as suggests?

I get "ERROR: the probe is larger than 400K". Not a bug I reckon, but I cannot figure out how to work around it. Any suggestions?

For anyone else having trouble: setting the user agent to the one used by chrome fixes it: "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/65.0.3325.162 Safari/537.36"

I had thought so. 36 is very old.

I get the same message in qutebrowser and falkon, so it should be a qtwebengine issue. I'll check upstream and file an issue if one isn't filed already.

Cheers!

Works fine in general, but whatsapp web stopped working for me a few days ago and this update did not fix it.

It says that chrome36+ is required. How would one check what version of chrome/chromium is provided with qt5webengine?

Message screenshot here: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/qutebrowser-whatsapp-web.png

Tested, works well. Thanks for the quick update :)

works OK in normal usage.

Work fine, no oddity noted.

Works well in general.

Seems to work ok in normal usage.

Work OK in normal usage.

Everything seems to work fine in normal usage.