Comments
ankursinha
Seems to work fine in normal usage, no regressions noted
Seems to work fine in normal usage, no regressions noted
Seems to work fine in my normal daily workflow. No regressions noted.
Everything seems to work great. Thanks!
Works, thanks!
Same here, looks like python-packaging needs to be updated to a new version for this one:
nothing provides python3.10dist(packaging) >= 21.3 needed by python3-statsmodels-0.13.2-1.fc35.x86_64
So, not currently installable.
This update has been unpushed.
This update has been unpushed.
the biber 2.17 update is here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1e62fda204
Getting errors here with biber, which is at the latest release:
------------
INFO - This is Biber 2.17
..
ERROR - Error: Found biblatex control file version 3.7, expected version 3.8.
This means that your biber (2.17) and biblatex (3.16) versions are incompatible.
See compat matrix in biblatex or biber PDF documentation.
INFO - ERRORS: 1
$ rpm -qa \*biblatex\* \*biber\*
texlive-biblatex-svn57272-48.fc35.noarch
texlive-biblatex-nature-svn57262-48.fc35.noarch
biber-2.17-1.fc35.noarch
The biber documentation says: "Biber 2.17 is now released. It should be used in conjunction with biblatex 3.17". but this update has biblatex 3.16.
Seeing the same error here:
------------
INFO - This is Biber 2.17
..
ERROR - Error: Found biblatex control file version 3.7, expected version 3.8.
This means that your biber (2.17) and biblatex (3.16) versions are incompatible.
See compat matrix in biblatex or biber PDF documentation.
INFO - ERRORS: 1
I do have the latest available biblatex installed:
$ rpm -qa \*biblatex\* \*biber\*
texlive-biblatex-svn57272-48.fc35.noarch
texlive-biblatex-nature-svn57262-48.fc35.noarch
biber-2.17-1.fc35.noarch
I'm not sure if the issue is here, or in the latest texlive update, though. Also noting it there.
nothing weird noted
nothing weird noted
works fine
Seems to work fine in normal usage, no regressions noted
Seems to work fine in normal usage, no regressions noted.
Boots fine!
Seems to work fine in normal daily usage, no regressions noted yet.
Seems to work fine in normal usage, no regressions noted